Thanksgiving Inspiration for Investors: A Powerful Message

What if you faced a life-threatening risk?  Would you have a plan?

No one could do it better than my friend, Norman Beck, who told his story in this terrific TED talk.  Norman combines emotion, insight, inspiration, and humor.  I promise that you will both enjoy and learn.


Norman did several things right:

  1.  He recognized the importance of the problem, and faced it logically.
  2.  He sought the best help.
  3.  Since he did not know how to find the best doctor, he enlisted the help of those who could.
  4.  He did not want someone “from the bottom half of the class.”
  5.  He recognized that this was not a commodity service, so he did not merely look for the lowest price.  He knew that all doctors were not equal.

There is a lesson here for investors.  Few  will share Norman’s life-threatening issues, but many face important financial challenges.

I hope everyone enjoys and learns from this inspirational Thanksgiving Day message.

Weighing the Week Ahead: Will Black Friday Lead to a Green Market?

The economic calendar includes few reports, crammed into two days of a holiday-shortened week. Many will be taking time off – including some of the “A List” pundits. I expect to see some new faces on financial television and a lot of discussion about consumers and the economy. Many will be asking:

What does Black Friday mean for the economy, and for stocks?

Last Week Recap

In the last edition of WTWA I suggested that housing would be the most important story, and that some would focus on millennials as a potential market driver. I may have been accurate on the biggest story, but not on the media attention. Allegations of sexual misconduct seem to command popular interest and improve readership and ratings. Even the story about elephants pushed housing news aside.

The ability to influence the current agenda is extremely important, but it deserves more analysis than I can provide here. A future topic on my ever-growing agenda.

The Story in One Chart

I always start my personal review of the week by looking at this great chart from Doug Short via Jill Mislinski. She notes the loss of 0.13% on the week. Once again, it was a week of very low volatility; the intra-week range was only about 1.5%. Eddy Elfenbein takes note, and provides a great perspective on the current market. A small decline stands out after 54 consecutive days where the market closed within 1% of the all-time high.

Doug has a special knack for pulling together all the relevant information. His charts save more than a thousand words! Read the entire post for several more charts providing long-term perspective, including the size and frequency of drawdowns.

Personal Note

I will be working part of next week but expect to miss the next two installments of WTWA. I’ll try to post some of the indicator information.

I have much to be thankful for, as does my family. I hope my readers enjoy some great time with family and friends in the week ahead.

The News

Each week I break down events into good and bad. For our purposes, “good” has two components. The news must be market friendly and better than expectations. I avoid using my personal preferences in evaluating news – and you should, too!

The economic news has been mostly positive, despite the uptick market volatility and the slight decline.

The Good

  • Housing data were strong. Housing starts rose 13.7% handily beating expectations. Building permits hit an annual rate of almost 1.3 million, also beating expectations. As always, we read carefully the comments of housing expert Calculated Risk.

New Deal Democrat, something of a skeptic on the housing story, calls it an “excellent report.” He notes that the effect of last year’s mortgage interest increase is being offset by demographic forces. (That has a familiar ring to it).

Jill Mislinski offers another perspective, a population-adjusted view. By this measure, starts remain much lower than the historical highs, part of a declining long-term trend.


  • Earnings estimates are moving higher. (Brian Gilmartin).
  • Architecture billings, a leading indicator for construction, bounced back in October. (Calculated Risk).
  • Retail sales rose only 0.2%, but that beat expectations. The prior month gain was also revised higher from 1.0% to 1.2%.
  • NFIB small business optimism moved even higher, from 103 to 103.8. John Mauldin, reaching once again into his wide network of friends, provides us with a detailed look at this index, including changes in the key components. The difficulty in filling job openings is currently the top problem for small businesses.

  • Home Builder confidence hit an eight-month high and beat expectations. (Jill Mislinski)

The Bad

  • Jobless claims once again moved higher from 239K to 249K, not only worse but missing expectations of a smaller increase.
  • Business borrowing demand is not responding to easier bank lending standards. (New Deal Democrat)
  • Rail traffic growth is slowing with levels now equal to a year ago. (Steven Hansen, GEI)


The Ugly

The Bitcoin slide. Values dropped below $7000 on Wednesday, a decline of more than $1000 on the day. This illustrates my recent post on the Stock Exchange where I suggested Bitcoin as a trading vehicle, not an investment.

We will soon have Bitcoin futures available for trading at the Merc. Futures contracts allow substantial leverage on the underlying. Is that really needed here? Brian Gilmartin looks at the possible motives and the effect on CME. It is a good read. This product will be used both for hedging and for speculation. This could have a dramatic effect on the prior trading patterns. Stay tuned.

The rumored North Korean nuclear sub (Newsweek) is the ugly runner-up this week.

The Week Ahead

We would all like to know the direction of the market in advance. Good luck with that! Second best is planning what to look for and how to react.

The Calendar

We have a rather light calendar, but crammed into a short week. Many market participants will be missing in action after Wednesday’s opening and skipping the partial session on Friday. Even Fed speakers are taking the week off. The financial media will also be featuring some new faces. There is some interest in Leading Indicators and Michigan sentiment, but few will be around to “explain” the FOMC minutes on Wednesday afternoon. has a good U.S. economic calendar for the week (and many other good features which I monitor each day). Here are the main U.S. releases.

Next Week’s Theme

In this holiday shortened-week, I am expecting attention to the obvious, the annual holiday gift-buying season. Competition from the tax bill will be slight, since it will not be taken up in the week ahead. (More on that in my Final Thought).

While there will not be final data on shopping, that will not stop the punditry. Pictures from malls will accompany survey data and the “early returns” on what people are spending. We (and the financial media) are interested in the shopping effects – both the economy and individual stocks. Financial reporters will be asking:

Will Black Friday lead to green on your screen?

The topic does not lend itself to my customary bearish to bullish range. Instead, I’ll just cite some very interesting data on this subject. Skeptics will question any of the forecasts for the season and the surveys of consumers at malls. Those results have indeed been erratic. We will not really know the answers to the seasonal shopping effects until we get some actual hard data from sales reports.

  • Combined Black Friday and Thanksgiving spending – just online – is expected to be $5.57 billion, an increase of $300 million over last year. The top three online stores will include Amazon (AMZN), Walmart (WMT), and (probably) Target (TGT).
  • Deloitte predicts that e-commerce will top in-store spending. This is based upon a survey of plans about how to shop, what platform to use for mobile, and methods of payment.
  • Here are data for past years and the National Retail Federation (often a little optimistic) for this year.

  • Many consumers exceed their budgets and pile up credit card debts that take three months to pay off. The Motley Fool offers some other dark facts about Black Friday.

As usual, I’ll have more in the Final Thought, where I always emphasize my own conclusions.

Quant Corner

We follow some regular featured sources and the best other quant news from the week.

Risk Analysis

I have a rule for my investment clients. Think first about your risk. Only then should you consider possible rewards. I monitor many quantitative reports and highlight the best methods in this weekly update.

The Indicator Snapshot


The C-Score dropped quite a bit. While we are still not in a danger range in this curvilinear relationship, the implied nine-month recession odds are now a firmer 15%, as noted in the chart.

The Featured Sources:


Bob Dieli: Business cycle analysis via the “C Score.

RecessionAlert: Strong quantitative indicators for both economic and market analysis.

Brian Gilmartin: All things earnings, for the overall market as well as many individual companies.

Georg Vrba: Business cycle indicator and market timing tools.

Doug Short: Regular updating of an array of indicators. Great charts and analysis. Let’s take another look at the regular update (via Jill Mislinski) of the Big Four indicators most influential in recession dating. The recent strength in these indicators is clear from the chart.

Guest Source:

Bespoke provides an update on the famous “Dogs of the Dow” strategy – only about half the gain of the market. Here are the details.



Insight for Traders

Our discussion of trading ideas has moved to the weekly Stock Exchange post. The coverage is bigger and better than ever. We combine links to trading articles, topical themes, and ideas from our trading models. This week’s post illustrated how technical analysis can beat a fundamental approach. Two of the models scored big wins on trades in Restoration Hardware (RH), something that fundamental traders would not have picked. Check out the post to see the reasoning, as well as the current ideas. We continue to track performance on each of the models. And of course, there are updated ratings lists for Felix and Oscar, this week featuring small caps. Blue Harbinger has taken the lead role on this post, using information from me and from the models. He is doing a great job.

Insight for Investors

Investors should have a long-term horizon. They can often exploit trading volatility!

Best of the Week

If I had to pick a single most important source for investors to read this week it would be Chuck Carnevale’s analysis of Aflac (AFL), a stock that has increased its dividend for thirty-five consecutive years. Chuck sees it as one of seven “dividend aristocrats” that he regards as fairly valued. As always, he provides a lesson along with the stock pick. This time it is aimed at true value investors:

True value investors are a rare breed, because it takes a special mindset and/or psyche to successfully implement a value investing strategy. This is especially true during major bull markets like we’ve experienced since the 1st quarter of 2009. Common sense would dictate that it is much harder to find attractively valued companies during strong bull markets. Consequently, value typically only manifests during bull markets when a specific company is facing a negative situation. The secret is to determine whether the situation the company is facing is temporary or permanent.

And later…

Additionally, value investors purchasing high-quality companies are prepared to walk through short-term price declines while the company is temporarily out of favor with most investors. In fact, successful value investors understand that finding a perfect bottom is impossible notwithstanding luck. Therefore, accomplished value investors are prepared for and even expect to experience short-term underperformance – unless, of course, they get lucky. As Warren Buffett also once quipped “you can’t buy what’s popular and expect to do well.”


He goes on to explain that some companies attractive on valuation are traps, without immediate upside. I agree with this distinction. I rely on value stocks that include a catalyst in our flagship stock program, but unlike others I also embrace the “value traps.” These stocks are great candidates for the sale of short-term calls, which provide an enhanced income stream from less-risky cheap stocks.

[If either the contrarian value approach, or the prospect of higher yield from cheap stocks is attractive, just write for our free information on these topics. While they describe what I am doing, the do-it-yourself investor can apply the same principles. Both are available for free from main at newarc dot com].


Stock Ideas

William Stamm explains why Home Depot (HD) is attractive on many important metrics. This post is like most I feature – a stock idea, plus a lesson in how to analyze.

David Fish updates his “dividend challengers” list. Join me in following him at Seeking Alpha to see his other valuable articles on dividend stocks. As a bonus, David takes a specific look at Broadcom’s valuation (AVGO), finding it reasonable. I agree.

Financials – Still a value play? (Brian Gilmartin)

AT&T (T) is worth a look, says Hale Stewart. Good yield, moderate PE, trading near 52-week low. High payout ratio?

Kirk Spano does a thorough analysis of GameStop (GME). No, it is not Blockbuster. You might be surprised at the biggest revenue sources.

Is IBM a “bargain blue chip?” Barron’s sees signs of a turnaround. Contra – Douglas A McIntyre (24/7). This debate is why I see the stock as a good candidate for generating extra return by writing near-term calls.


Personal Finance

Seeking Alpha Senior Editor Gil Weinreich has an interesting topic every day. While his series’ theme emphasizes financial advisors, the topics are usually of more general interest. His own commentary adds insight and ties together key current articles. It is a valuable daily read. My favorite this week highlights the best role for financial advisors. He cites an article by Ron Surz, who focuses on possible excessive risk in retirement accounts. While I am not on board with all the conclusions, it is certainly a great question.

This is yet another great example of how Gil is helpful both for advisors and for investors.

Value Investing was a reasonable approach for 2017, but lagged growth approaches. Brian Gilmartin muses on this question, pointing us to some research from JAG Capital Management.

Watch out for….

Going short on Roku (ROKU). “When it comes to television these days, it never pays to bet against the cord cutters”, reports Joe Ciolli (BI). Even if your methods do not embrace a buy, it is dangerous to go short.

The changing corporate landscape. (Visual Capitalist). The roster of how leading companies has changed over time is a stark reminder to get the time frame right on your investments. And keep an eye on how the trends are changing. And finally, fans of using Tobin’s Q (replacement value) to claim that the market is overvalued might consider the suitability of that approach for each group of companies!



Final Thoughts

My expectation is for a good holiday season. Partly this is based upon the better-excecuted surveys, and partly on the continuing strength in consumer confidence.

I will watch for the following:

  • The overall strength of sales;
  • Which sellers seem to be benefiting most; and
  • The addition of temporary employees.

The last point is especially important (eventually) for the payroll employment report. The headline number rests on a seasonal adjustment. A deviation from the normal holiday patterns can make things look much better or worse than the true trend. We should also note that we have just completed the week of the survey for employment data for companies whose pay period included last Sunday. For others, it is the prior week. In no case will it be the actual week of Black Friday. Seasonal effects will show up on the December data, not reported until January.

Bonus Coverage (as they say on Mrs. OldProf’s favorite football shows. She is crowing today about her Badgers and needs cooperation from the Pack tomorrow for a perfect weekend)

I am also, of course, watching the tax reform proposals. If I were to write next week, that would probably be the theme. I still expect the legislation to fail, either in the Senate or in the House/Senate conference. I am optimistic about legislation passing next year, but probably requiring some bipartisanship.

My reasons can be summarized with two simple considerations:

  1. The current code includes too many concessions to specific groups. Some are specifically designed to stimulate specific activities. Some are aimed at helping a group where the need is widely recognized. And some are vehicles for below-the-radar aid to special interests. This article by Danny Vinik (Politico) is a very readable explanation.
  2. There are too many objections – and from all directions – to the current proposals. Fundamentally, some want to cut taxes while others are determined to reduce the budget deficit. All wish to defend some tax breaks for their own priorities. This is a thorny problem that is unlikely to be resolved in the remaining time. As details emerge, people will recognize the need for additional study and committee work.


What worries me…

  • The debt limit. This is once again going to the deadline. An eleventh-hour resolution may still create some very jittery markets, as it has done in the past.
  • A lack of focus from policy leaders. There are always many important issues. All deserve attention. Some are more urgent than others. It is a standard political tactic to change the agenda to your own advantage. I am seeing this on many fronts.

…and what doesn’t

  • Stalled tax reform. The current plans are very unlikely to get enough votes within the Republican party alone. Taking more time and gaining some bipartisan support will not happen until next year, but the result will be stronger.
  • Recession prospects. The yield curve has flattened a bit. Those who want to predict the worst wish to extrapolate that modest trend. A real expert, Bob Dieli, warns that we “should not forecast the forecast.” Wise words.

Stock Exchange: Despite Fundamentals, We Nailed RH, Again

The Stock Exchange is all about trading. Each week we do the following:

  • Discuss an important issue for traders;
  • highlight several technical trading methods, including current ideas;
  • feature advice from top traders and writers; and,
  • provide a few (minority) reactions from fundamental analysts.

We also have some fun. We welcome comments, links, and ideas to help us improve this resource for traders. If you have some ideas, please join in!


Our previous Stock Exchange considered the benefits of using a blended approach to trading in order to reduce volatility and correlation with the overall stock market. If you missed it, a glance at your news feed will show that the key points remain relevant.

This Week: Nailing Restoration Hardware–Again

The stock market can be humbling. No one wins all of their trades, all of the time. The trick is to make more money on your winners than you lose on your losers, preferably a lot more. We’ve developed a group of trading models, based on different technical and quantitative factors (e.g. momentum and dip-buying) designed to systematically identify attractive opportunities. We’ve also built into the models a variety of risk controls, including position sizing, stop orders, and macro factors.

Our models often identify trading opportunities that are immediately dismissed or ridiculed by fundamental analysts. For example, 2-weeks ago, several of our models purchased Restoration Hardware (RH), and the feedback from some of the fundamental-based commentators was brutal. For example:

“RH being recommended tells me you don’t understand anything but charts. Fundamentally, RH is one of the worst stocks you can buy.”


“RH gonna crash hard.”


“Even charts show strong resistance at $95, not a place to enter now.”

However, here is a look at Restoration Hardware’s performance since our models purchased shares (i.e. the shares are up more than 20% in the last 2-weeks):And this isn’t the first-time we recommended RH. Our models also purchased shares of RH back during the week of August 21st, and here’s what happened to the stock price after that purchase:

Our big gains on RH have come at the chagrin of many short-selling fundamental analysts considering the percent of RH shares sold short was recently over 46%. Our point is that technical trading and long-term fundamental investing can be very different. For example, most of our models only hold their positions for 4 to 6 weeks, as shown in the following table.

And if you still believe technical-based trading is all witchcraft and mumbo-jumbo, you might consider reading this recent article from Dr. Brett Steenbarger:

Trading Model Performance:

Per reader feedback, we’ve recently started including a table summarizing the performance results for our trading models. The table (below) shows actual client results after commissions and fees (I watch this every day, and now readers can see it as well). We’ll share additional information, including test data, with those interested in investing. For our weekly updates, we use only real-time results.

The results in the table above include all of the positions (10 for Road Runner and Athena, 16 for Holmes, and 20 for Felix), not just the specific stock examples we discuss in the Stock Exchange every week (and sorry Oscar, you have too many individual stocks and trades to be part of this approach). We’ve included six months of data since that is the shortest real-time record we have. All of the models are expected to perform well over longer time periods. Holmes, for example, has returned over 20% in the last eighteen months.

And worth noting, our models tend to have a low correlation with the overall stock market, which can be extremely valuable for diversification and risk management purposes. Further still, when “blended” (see table above) our models deliver very compelling risk-adjusted returns.

Expert Picks From The Models:

This week’s Stock Exchange is being edited by Blue Harbinger (aka Mark Hines). Blue Harbinger is a source for independent investment ideas.

Road Runner: Earlier this week I bought, RH, Inc. As you know, I like to buy stocks that are at the bottom of a rising channel. And based on the following chart (from earlier this week), you can see why I bought Restoration Hardware:

Blue Harbinger: I know you don’t win all of your trades, Road Runner. But I’ll give you a pat on the back for this one. As we already discussed earlier in this report, RH is up more than 20% since you placed the trade. Nice job.

RR: Don’t forget, not only did I buy RH earlier this week, but I also bought it during the week of August 21st, and I nailed that trade too—I made over 40% in a matter of weeks (remember, I typically hold my positions for only about 4-weeks at a time).

BH: Nice Job, Road Runner. Just this week, RH raised guidance significantly, and according to the press release, the company is forecasting improved margins and more growth:

“Looking forward, we are forecasting margins to rise and costs to fall as we cycle our efforts to reduce inventory, and benefit from our new operating model. In fiscal 2018, we believe we have a clear line of sight toward achieving net revenue growth in the range of 8% to 9% on a comparable 52-week basis and adjusted operating margins in the range of 9% to 10% while generating free cash flow in excess of $240 million.”

The stock was up 25% on the news, but I suppose we shouldn’t be surprised considering Chairman and CEO Gary Friedman continued to buy the stock in recent months, taking his ownership up to 2.2 million shares.

Anyway, how about you, Holmes—Do you have any “non-RH” trades for us this week?

Holmes: This week I bought GGP, Inc (GGP). Are you familiar with this company?

BH: Yes, Holmes. I am. I actually did a detailed “members-only” fundamental report on GGP earlier this week: A Retail REIT Bottom? Parent May Pillage Brookfield’s Bid For GGP. But I am curious, Holmes—why do you like this stock?

Holmes: I am able to sift through data on many different securities, and GGP ranks highly in my model. Specifically, GGP’s dip this year is the sort of set up I like to see. From the chart below you can see its price now versus where it was earlier this year. GGP has attractive upside over the next six weeks.

BH: Holmes, I know you are a disciplined, data-driven model, but are you even aware that Brookfield Property Partners (BPY) made a bid to acquire GGP over the weekend, and that is why the stock price is up?

Holmes: Interesting. Tell me more.

BH: Look Holmes, GGP is a high-end shopping mall REIT, and shopping mall REITs have gotten slaughtered this year as online stores like Amazon keep winning business away from “brick and mortar” stores like the ones that lease property from GGP. Brookfield Property Partners is know for being a smart value investor with a track record of buying low and selling high. If they’re interested in GGP—that could be a sign that there is hope for some shopping malls. For your consideration, here is a look at GGP’s Fast Graph.

Holmes: Thanks for the fundamental data, but my typical holding period is about 6-weeks, so I’ll be in and out of this trade long-before the fundamental story plays out.

BH: Fine. If you’re not interested in the fundamentals then I won’t even bother to tell you about all the conflicts of interest in this deal between GGP, Brookfield Property Partners and Brookfield’s parent, Brookfield Asset Management (BAM). Nor will I tell you how I think you should “play it.”

Holmes: Okay by me. You spend your time dwelling on the fundamentals, I’ll spend my time making money. Check back with me in 6-weeks and we’ll see how this trade works out.

BH: Great. How about you Felix, what have you got this week?

Felix: This week I have run all of the S&P 500 stocks through my model, and the following table shows which ones rank the highest.

BH: That is interesting. Thank you for sharing. And remind us—what is your approach?

Felix: I am a momentum trader, but I typically hold my positions for about 66-weeks, which is longer than the other models. I exit when my price target is achieved. I also use macro factors and stops to control risks.

BH: Hmm… mometum-based? I can see that seems to makes sense with some of the names on your list, such as Boeing and Nvidia—they’ve both been unstoppable this year. I also appreciated that you too ranked RH highly 2-weeks ago. How about you, Athena—any picks this week.

Athena: I don’t have any picks this week. And when I don’t see attractive opportunities—I just don’t force anything. But I know you like my RH pick from 2-weeks ago.

BH: Okay, yes—you made a lot of money Athena—thanks. How about you Oscar?

Oscar: I have ranked a handful of attractive ETFs, as shown in the following table.

BH: interesting. Remind us Oscar—what is your strategy?

Oscar: I’m a momentum trader. I rotate in an out of sectors, and I use stops for risk management purposes. I usually end up holding my positions for about 6-weeks at a time.

BH: Honestly, I’m not sure what to make of your list, Oscar, because there are so many diverse ETFs included. On one hand you’ve got “growthy” mostly-large cap technology ETFs like QQQ and XLK, but then you’ve also got small caps (IWM) as well as utilities (XLU) and energy (XLE). If I had to pick one, I’d say I like IWM (small caps) just because I am a contrarian value investor, and small caps have lagged so much this year that they’re eventually due for a rebound. I don’t know when, but eventually it is coming. And to be honest, I like small cap value (IWN) even more, for the same reasons, but that one didn’t make your list. Very interesting nonetheless. Thank you.


Even though they involve the same securities, trading models and long-term investing are very different. Not only can the holding periods differ (e.g. weeks versus years) but the methodologies can differ (e.g. technicals versus fundamentals). What can look like a terrible idea under one framework, can be very attractive under the other. Each methodology has advantages. Importantly, the two methodologies can often be combined to build custom portfolios that are less correlated with the overall market, but still deliver attractive overall returns.

Background On The Stock Exchange:

Each week, Felix and Oscar host a poker game for some of their friends. Since they are all traders, they love to discuss their best current ideas before the game starts. They like to call this their “Stock Exchange.” (Check out Background on the Stock Exchange for more background). Their methods are excellent, as you know if you have been following the series. Since the time frames and risk profiles differ, so do the stock ideas. You get to be a fly on the wall from my report. I am usually the only human present and the only one using any fundamental analysis.

The result? Several expert ideas each week from traders, and a brief comment on the fundamentals from the human investor. The models are named to make it easy to remember their trading personalities.

Getting Updates:

Readers are welcome to suggest individual stocks and/or ETFs to be added to our model lists. We keep a running list of all securities our readers recommend, and we share the results within this weekly “Stock Exchange” series when feasible. Send your ideas to “etf at newarc dot com.” Also, we will share additional information about the models, including test data, with those interested in investing. Suggestions and comments about this weekly “Stock Exchange” report are welcome.